MRF v/s Apollo Tyres: A comparison - I     (17-Apr-2012 )



In line with the auto industry, the tyre industry in India has also shown good growth over the past few years. In fact, since tyres wear out every few years, growth prospects for the entire industry holds even greater promise than the industry it is so heavily reliant on. In FY11, the Indian tyre industry is believed to have clocked a turnover in the region of Rs 350 bn with volumes increasing as much as 30% in the passenger vehicle category.

The growth story is far from over though. With auto penetration in India lower than even some developing nations, growth prospects are only likely to improve from here on. In view of this, we make an attempt to compare Apollo Tyres and MRF, two of the biggest tyre manufacturers in India and make an attempt to find out which of these looks a better bet from a long term perspective.

Background

Apollo Tyres current produces the entire range of automotive tyres for ultra and high speed passenger cars, truck and bus, farm, Off-The-Road, industrial and specialty applications like mining, retreaded tyres and retreading material. These are produced across Apollo's nine manufacturing locations in India, Netherlands and Southern Africa. For the first time, in 2006 Apollo ventured outside India in its quest to test itself outside its home comforts. Apollo acquired Dunlop Tyres International Pty Ltd in South Africa (since renamed as Apollo Tyres South Africa Pty Ltd) and Zimbabwe, taking on southern Africa as the second domestic market. The company holds brand rights for the Dunlop brand across 30 African countries. In 2009, Apollo acquired Vredestein Banden BV in the Netherlands, and thereby adding Europe as its third crucial market.

On the other hand, synonymous with its corporate mascot of a muscleman, MRF is the first tyre company in India to reach a turnover of Rs 50 bn. In fact, its gross revenues crossed the Rs 100 bn mark in FY11. The company manufactures the largest range of tyres in India and is the market leader with the largest market share in almost every segment of the tyre industry. Since 1984, MRF Tyres has consistently been chosen as OEM fitment by almost every major car manufacturer in India. Apart from tyres MRF also manufactures conveyor belts, pretreads and advanced polyurethane paints.

Operational performance

Let us move on to the operational performance of the two companies in the last five years. As far as revenue and profit growth is concerned, there is very little to choose we believe. While Apollo Tyres has managed to improve its consolidated topline and bottomline by 26% and 37% average annual growth (CAGR) between FY06 and FY11, the same numbers for MRF have come in at 20% and 34% respectively. However, it should be noted that a good part of growth for Apollo Tyres has come on account of the acquisitions it has made in recent years. In other words, its growth also has some inorganic component to it. The growth for MRF on the other hand has been all organic. Also important to add that both the companies managed to improve their net profit margins during the period. While Apollo Tyres' margins improved from 3% in FY06 to 4.7% in FY11, MRF's 3.2% margins in FY06 were a significant improvement from 1.9% that it recorded in FY11.

In the next article in the series, we will consider the capital efficiency of the two companies.

By Equitymaster - A leading 'independent' research initiative focused on providing well-researched and unbiased opinions on BSE and NSE Stocks.


Quanutm Information Services Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
Any act of copying, reproducing or distributing this newsletter whether wholly or in part, for any purpose without the permission of PersonalFN is strictly prohibited and shall be deemed to be copyright infringement.

Disclaimer: Quantum Information Services Pvt. Limited (PersonalFN) is not providing any investment advice through this service and, does not constitute or is not intended to constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation to an offer to buy or sell financial products, units or securities. All content and information is provided on an 'As Is' basis by PersonalFN. Information herein is believed to be reliable but PersonalFN does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and expressly disclaims all warranties and conditions of any kind, whether express or implied. PersonalFN and its subsidiaries / affiliates / sponsors or employees, personnel, directors will not be responsible for any direct / indirect loss or liability incurred by the user as a consequence of him or any other person on his behalf taking any investment decisions based on the contents and information provided herein. This is not a specific advisory service to meet the requirements of a specific client. Use of this information is at the user's own risk. The user must make his own investment decisions based on his specific investment objective and financial position and using such independent advisors as he believes necessary. All intellectual property rights emerging from this newsletter are and shall remain with PersonalFN. This is for your personal use and you shall not resell, copy, or redistribute this newsletter or any part of it, or use it for any commercial purpose. The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. As a condition to accessing PersonalFN’s content and website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here.