Your insurance premium may soon reduce   Sep 16, 2011

  September 16, 2011
Impact

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is planning to heighten the criteria for the appointment of actuaries or experts who assess and price risks for insurance business. Such a step from the IRDA aims at enhancing scrutiny of financial impact of risk and uncertainty in insurance business.

Under the draft of the proposed norms the IRDA has said that an actuary should be an employee of the company and below 65 years of age. Moreover, the regulator has also stated that (with effect from 2013) the actuaries should have a minimum 10 years of experience in the industry with a minimum 2 years of service in a life or general insurance company. Also, the said actuary must have 5 years of experience after getting actuary fellowship.

At present there's no age limit for appointment of actuaries; and general insurance companies in particular hire actuaries as consultants who generally are above 65 years of age. Only 5 to 6 general insurance companies have fulltime actuaries who are employees, while the remaining 17 companies work with part-time consultants.

Interestingly the draft norms come at a time when the regulator (the IRDA) has failed to fill up the post (lying vacant for the past four months) of Member Actuary - a key person to take a call on product approvals at IRDA. But nonetheless we believe that the proposed norms drafted by the insurance regulator would enable an efficient pricing mechanism and reduce underwriting losses as vigilant eligibility criteria would help to plug in the inconsistencies in the present methods. This in turn would also lead to fair premiums being charged from the policyholders thereby preclude over-pricing or under-pricing of insurance premiums.
 
Multibagger Stock Ideas
 

Claim this Free & Exclusive Guide Today. Act Now!

 

CLICK HERE to know more...

 
Impact

The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) for the month of July 2011 tumbled down to its 2-year low by growing at only 3.3% as against 10.0% in the same period last year. When seen on a month-on-month (m-o-m) basis, the journey for industrial growth has akin to a "see-saw" ride due to RBI's persistent anti-inflationary stance right since March 2010.
 

(Source :CSO, PersonalFN Research)

The dismal performance of the IIP for July 2011 can be attributed to. the following factors:
 
  • Manufacturing Sector: The manufacturing sector (which constitutes 76% of the IIP) slowed down by registering a meagre growth of 2.3% (as against 10.3% in June 2011) as RBI continued to with its anti-inflationary monetary policy stance.
     
  • Mixed sectoral growth: The consumer goods index managed to remain in the positive terrain, registering a growth of 6.3% in July 2011 (as against 2.3% in June 2011). Consumer durables and Consumer non-durables grew 8.6% and 4.1% respectively (as against 1.5% and 3.0% respectively in June 2011).

    However, the capital goods index took the maximum beating (due to a halt in the capex plans of the companies) as it faltered to -15.2% in July 2011 from a positive 38.2% in June 2011. Intermediated goods too contracted to -1.1% against 0.6% in June 2011, while the Basic goods index posted a appealing growth of 10.0% in July 2011 (as against 7.5% in June 2011).
     
Despite growth in the core sector (consisting of eight core infrastructure industries - coal, crude oil, natural gas, petroleum refinery products, fertilisers, finished steel, cement and electricity) of 7.8% in July 2011 (as against 5.2% in June 2011), the IIP couldn't put up a good show. This thus reveals that prevailing high interest rates are hindering industrial growth. In the second quarter mid-review of monetary policy 2011-12 (scheduled on September 16, 2006) we expect that the central bank would refrain from increasing policy rates due to the following factors:
 
  • Elevated borrowing cost
  • Elevated input cost
  • Chances of slowdown in consumer spending
  • Downward revision in GDP targets (from 9.0% to 8.2% by PMEAC)
  • Nervous sentiment in the capital markets
  • Manufacturing Purchasing Manager's Index (PMI) at a 20-month low of 52.6 points in August 2011



  •  
As investor, to know what you should do please click here.
 
Impact

In order to keep the equity markets away from any systemic risks, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is planning to scrap the highest Net Asset Value (NAV) guarantee products. This could further dent the sales of the Unit Linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs) as the highest NAV guarantee products account for 20% of ULIP sales.

Under the highest NAV guarantee products, customers are guaranteed returns based on the highest NAV a policy has achieved during the entire term of the insurance plan. However, IRDA is weary of the fact the insurers protect the guarantee by appropriately apportioning money in debt instruments. When the market falls the exposure in debt instruments increases and insurers try to sell equities at marginal profits. If there is too much concentration of such products in the market, a large number of insurers might sell equities at the same time to protect the guarantee, leading to a further market fall which leads to systemic risks.

In our opinion the IRDA has the right thing by putting a stop gap on the so-called 'highest NAV guarantee plans'. Many investors have been lured to buy such ULIP plans by their agents / distributors / relationship managers in the name of providing huge returns based on the highest NAV achieved by the plan in its tenure.

Policyholders should keep in mind that insurance is for indemnifying your risk, and thus insurance and investment needs should be dealt seperately. For insuring youself only pure term insurance plans are appropriate, and while investing you should give due attention to your investment objectives, goals, age, income, no. of dependents amongst others; which is a holistic investment planning process rather than an ad-hoc activity.
Weekly Facts
Close Change %Change
BSE Sensex* 16,933.83 66.9 0.40%
Re/US$ 47.66 (1.5) -3.16%
Gold Rs/10g 28,165.00 595.0 2.16%
Crude ($/barrel) 111.33 (4.9) (4.9)
FD Rates (1-Yr) 7.25% - 9.25%
Weekly change as on September 15, 2011
*BSE Sensex as on September 16, 2011
In this issue
 
This Week's Poll !!!
************
Do you hold investments in Highest NAV Guaranteed ULIPs?
 
To Vote Now!

In an interview with the Mint, Mr. Pankaj Razdan - Deputy Chief Executive of Aditya Birla Group shared his views FII flows in India, inflation in India and RBI's monetary policy stance.

Mr. Razdan believes that at the end of the day whether it is the U.S. or Europe (with their respective problems) investors (in the U.S. and Europe) still have money. "People have made lots of money. Per capita income was far higher than any of the emerging countries put together. So, there is problem today in the economy, but people have money. End of the day, where are they going to put this money? It has to go into an asset class which is going to give money. Today, that asset class has largely been between the U.S. and Europe, the second asset class has been gold; most of these people started doing a flight to safety towards gold.", he said. According to Mr. Razdan, the fiscal deficit is the big reason for FIIs not investing in India. Explaining his stance on the matter he said, "I think we have a very high burden government and there is too much of money. There is too much of debt as well. Interestingly, if I look at complete debt, which is government, individual, banks all put together, and if I compare with any of the developed world, I mean the U.S. and Europe are 330-340%, China is 180% to the GDP. They are 116%, so we don't face the same problem the rest of the world is facing of deleveraging it. The difference is 1:3. So the whole fact is the notion that our overall debt to GDP is very high, so deficit would be a big problem."

As far as the inflation bug is concerned Mr. Razdan thinks that inflation today, is largely a global phenomenon. He is of the opinion that one has to live with the fact that those days are gone when we lived with inflation of 5.25% or 5-6% 10 years back. "Inflation has largely been exported because of excess liquidity in the world. If we really break down the inflation between agriculture, oil, if we keep these two separate, your input price on core inflation has really gone up. To me, if the whole world is shrinking right now, we are looking at the largest part of the world, which are consuming part of this commodity or other input core inflationary items. If they are slowing down, whether it's the US, Europe or rest of the world, except emerging markets, inflation would really come down and I think most investors would be looking at those things. So, in a way, it's not a right statement to make, but the slowing of the US and Europe augurs well for India because that is going to put pressure off the commodities if they are not going to grow. So to me, it's a transitionary issue right now," he said.

On RBI's monetary policy stance, whether it would go with a rate hike or halt it, he said, "One is what I would like to have it and what I think government will look at and RBI will look at. I think it's a split verdict. One is that you clearly see that RBI wanting it to slowdown so that inflationary pressure would really come down by way of consumption slowdown and to me from 8% to 6% is a massive slowdown. So if we look at that, if we look at the global turmoil, you look at the global situations slowdown, you look at good rainfall, agriculture commodity has to go down. You look at overall the gloomy mood and around those things, there is a school of thought that it's a time for us to go and halt. Not to stop, but to halt as of now. It may be a situation after a couple of months you see that inflation is still going and we always have the tool to go and do it, but it's a situation reached where you could possibly be hurt. But this section of people who are predicting is far lower than the people who believe that there will be 25 basis point kind of a hike because they would like to see a very strong indicator that it is under control, it is not 9.8% and becoming 9.2%. They want to see a very clear indicator that by March quarter it could be substantially lower."
 

Actuary: A professional statistician working for an insurance company. They evaluate your application and medical records to project how long you will live.
 
(Source: Investopedia)
QUOTE OF THE WEEK

"If your outgo exceeds your income, then your upkeep will be your downfall."
 
-Bill Earle
   
  • Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund has been the most active amongst the fund houses in fighting against management proposals that may hurt minority shareholder interests in its role as an institutional investor in various companies.

    At various instances, Franklin has been active in opposing proposals, including payment of commission to non-executive directors of Reliance Communications; re-appointment of Mr. S Bhattacharya as director at state-owned steelmaker SAIL; alteration of memorandum and articles by Tata Motors; and revision of promoter remuneration at tractor maker Escorts Ltd, data posted on its website shows.

    It is indeed a very good example set forth by Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund for others to follow. By using the power of voting an investor can keep a check on unnecessary proposals or plans which may turn out to be detrimental to the health of the company and thus erode investors' wealth. Other mutual fund houses too, should take up this exercise in a thoughtful manner to promote long term wealth creation for the investor.
     
  • In order to boost Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) flows in the long-term infrastructure bonds, the Finance Ministry has reduced the residual maturity limit and the lock-in period for investment in such bonds.

    Out of the total limit of $25 billion, upto $3 billion can be invested by qualified foreign investors to subscribe to mutual fund debt schemes that invest in the infrastructure sector. Another $5 billion have been carved out of the remaining $22 billion for FII investments in long-term infrastructure bonds with an initial maturity of five years or more at the time of issue and residual maturity of one year at the time of first purchase by FIIs. Easing the norms further, there will be a lock-in period of one year, during which FIIs can trade among themselves but without being able to sell the bonds to domestic investors. The remaining $17 billion limit can be invested in long-term infrastructure bonds that have an initial maturity of five years or more at the time of issue and residual maturity of three years at the time of first purchase by FIIs. These investments will be subject to a lock-in period of three years.
     
  • Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh said that good road infrastructure is crucial to achieving 9% growth, targeted for the next Five Year Plan (2012-13 to 2016-17). Further he said, "Infrastructure will play a key role in achieving our growth target of of nine percent. Our effort is to double the investment of $500 million in the 11th Five Year plan to around $1 trillion in the 12th plan."
     
  • The New Pension Scheme's (NPS) fund managers have proposed to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) to allow them to use their respective distribution networks (mutual fund agents) in order to boost the sales of the NPS. Training would also be imparted to the mutual fund agents by their respective NPS fund managers. Apart from this the NPS's fund managers have also proposed a commission of at least two-three per cent to the agents for selling the product.
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for Private Circulation only and not for sale, is only for information purposes and Quantum Information Services Limited (PersonalFN) is not providing any professional/investment advice through it and, does not constitute or is not intended to constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation to an offer to buy or sell financial products, units or securities. PersonalFN disclaims warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, as to any matter/content contained in this newsletter, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. PersonalFN and its subsidiaries / affiliates / sponsors / trustee or their officers, employees, personnel, directors will not be responsible for any direct/indirect loss or liability incurred by the user as a consequence of his or any other person on his behalf taking any investment decisions based on the contents of this newsletter. Use of this newsletter is at the user's own risk. The user must make his own investment decisions based on his specific investment objective and financial position and using such independent advisors as he believes necessary. PersonalFN does not warrant completeness or accuracy of any information published in this newsletter. All intellectual property rights emerging from this newsletter are and shall remain with PersonalFN. This newsletter is for your personal use and you shall not resell, copy, or redistribute this newsletter, or use it for any commercial purpose. The user accepts the terms of use on this web site and agrees to be bound by such terms of use and any such revisions and changes.

Daily Wealth Letter


Fund of The Week


Knowledge Center


Money Simplified Guides (FREE)


Mutual Fund Fact Sheets


Tools & Calculators